Request-level trace
Tokens, estimated model cost, latency, retries, failures, and workflow stage.
AI Cost & Quality Diagnostic
A five-working-day, provider-neutral analysis of one repeatable AI workflow. No production changes. No promised savings percentage. Just a defensible decision package.
What you receive
Tokens, estimated model cost, latency, retries, failures, and workflow stage.
Representative cases, explicit rubric, and mandatory quality threshold.
Applicable tests across routing, caching, output controls, retries, batching, or local substitution.
Accepted and rejected changes, limitations, expected impact, effort, risk, and rollback guidance.
A clear before-and-after view that retains failed candidates instead of hiding them.
A 45-minute review with the technical owner and a path to separately scoped implementation.
Five-day sequence
Day 1
Confirm the workflow, cases, acceptance threshold, available usage data, and prohibited experiments.
Day 2
Normalize tokens, cost, latency, retries, errors, repeated context, and frontier-model defaults.
Day 3
Test only relevant levers while preserving the original configuration and identical cases.
Day 4
Reject regressions and calculate cost per successful run using disclosed rates and assumptions.
Day 5
Deliver the scorecard, limitations, prioritized backlog, effort estimate, and rollback notes.
Good fit
Not the right engagement
Residual Forge / founding cohort
Tell us which AI workflow you run repeatedly and where cost, latency, or quality is creating friction.